Post by cupcakes on Mar 31, 2018 18:43:23 GMT
tpfkar
Mar 31, 2018 17:30:51 GMT @miccee said:
You lie nearly nonstop. I said for normal non-deranged peeps that life is good and wiping out all life would be baaaaaad. Sane non-psychopathic non-wallowing human kind of a thing. Whatever you're tying to crap-squish in via vapid semantics with "wrong/problem" is just a bit part of your continuous crassly deranged boneheaded insipidity. You can "as if there were" out your twitted arse until your AI savior comes home. A universe with life is a great thing, at least life as we know it, and without would be berry berry sad, from the perspective of uncrushed undemented peepizoids, of course.And sorry, but patently coo-coo from you doesn't yield nonsecular, regardless of your indifference to (har, more like your enthusiasm for) the great cost to the vulnerable, and access by murderous crazies, and your personal wish that the mentally ill be available for fellow predators to be subject to whatever barbarity you can get the poor confused ill persons to assent to. What's wild is that even such psychopathy pales in comparison to your whimsical dreams of the forced mass-sterilization of women and mass-murder of countless of all types.
Not at all, because it's better for me to suffer than for a greater number of people to suffer.
Would they be the disembodied souls floating about the ether that you're so desperate to save by forcing them into an existence for which they had never asked?The whole basis of my philosophy is a profound moral concern for the wellbeing of the vulnerable, whose wellbeing I deem to be equally as important as my own. So that comment is pure libel. They wouldn't be vulnerable in the first place if not for someone like you taking out a credit card in their name, then running up colossal debts on it without their permission, then forcing those vulnerables to be enslaved to that debt which can never be paid off before death. Yes, I even favour rather draconian and authoritarian methods of preventing people from running up that debt, and I also favour liberal laws allowing everyone has had these debts imposed on them to be able to opt-out at any time, with the full support of the legal system and medical-industrial establishment. If everyone would agree only to run up debts on their own credit cards, then there would be no need for mass sterlisation or mass-murder.
Since you cannot tell me what the 'cost' is of ceasing to exist (at one's own request, of course), then the only 'costs' that you could possibly be referring to are paid off not by the vulnerables but by those who depend on enslaving the vulnerables (that would be people like yourself).
The whole basis of your philosophy is a predatory quest for your broken-down pathetic ideal of religious perfection. Simpy the negative image of the worship you engaged in all your life before you discovered the youtube crazies that matched your self-wallowing Eeyore morbidity. Whatever crazy lengths you need to go to to pretend some status for yourself.
I just thank you for your continuous shattered teary deliveries of great broken morbid humor. The fact that you trade on insipid semantics of "cost" of ceasing to exist leaves really no room for anything other than mocking you Erj types. I'd feel bad if you weren't such a lying hypocritical doofus with it.
And if society wants the fairest possible state of affairs, that would mean no humans and no society.
