Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2018 1:13:25 GMT
tpfkar A psychopath isn't someone who wants to prioritise the victims (potential and actual) over the aggressors. A psychopath is someone who wants to "prioritize the victims" by exterminating the victims before and even after they can choose for themselves, force sterilizing all women, nuke the populations of the world, and craps out patent crazy like the "dead can't hurt I must kill you to save you" pure insanity as justification for anything.
On that note, you've also called me "deranged", which is the mental illness equivalent of "n*****"If you're saying that an aborted foetus is a 'victim', then you're in with the rabid evangelical Christians who oppose the right to abortion. The foetus is no more victimised by mandatory abortion than by elective abortion. In either case, it is not a morally relevant entity with any interests invested in their continued existence. All I want to do is to take away the right to play God. And I'm not in favour of killing anyone who doesn't want to be killed, unless it's determined that omnicide is the only way to nip in the bud the perpetual cycle of imposition. Don't forget that a mass extinction is the eventual consequence of your views as well, but just imposed on a population that is temporally vastly removed from our own. So either natalism or antinatalism will result in the extinction of all life, but with antinatalism there would likely be less suffering involved. |
|
