|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Apr 4, 2018 1:27:28 GMT
tpfkar So the hypocrisy is so gargantuan you can't show where I've gone "back and forth over and over again" with Arlon as much as you have with mic, nor where our discussions were about values? Well good luck continuing to play that card! So what's my supposed misconception of Occam? This should be good for a larf. "As much as I have with mic" is irrelevant. After a bit it's all the same. You've done it multiple times with me. And it seems either you or Arlon could equally fill in for miccee. And larf away, I sure have. You even yapped it as your "best evidence" for something you "believed in". I really admire how understanding you are to people who have different opinions to you, such as yourself.It's not irrelevant, it's part-and-parcel of the "ad infinitum" part. You can't claim hypocrisy until you define that in numbers and the definition is not "whatever amount rabbit wants it to be so he can claim hypocrisy." And even if you can define it numbers, you'd still have to show it was about values in order to claim hypocrisy. So what's the misconception? Are you going to explain it or just make yet another baseless accusation?
|
|