|
|
Post by cupcakes on Apr 4, 2018 1:38:59 GMT
tpfkar It's not irrelevant, it's part-and-parcel of the "ad infinitum" part. You can't claim hypocrisy until you define that in numbers and the definition is not "whatever amount rabbit wants it to be so he can claim hypocrisy." And even if you can define it numbers, you'd still have to show it was about values in order to claim hypocrisy. So what's the misconception? Are you going to explain it or just make yet another baseless accusation?  I can and do point out your ridiculous droning hypocrisy. You count up your recent responses to Arlon and heal thyself. And you'd have to show that the interactions you were gassing on about were all about values and not also a great amount of flat out lies, patent murderous crazy and repeated irrationalities of the kind that get people to beep their way to all kinds of predatory psychopathy. That it's more than a heuristic to help prefer equally well-evidenced theories or direct efforts on lesser-evidenced ones, much less the "best evidence" to make you "believe in" something. I really admire how understanding you are to people who have different opinions to you, such as yourself.
|
|