|
|
Post by cupcakes on Apr 4, 2018 2:45:53 GMT
tpfkar If you're saying that an aborted foetus is a 'victim', then you're in with the rabid evangelical Christians who oppose the right to abortion. The foetus is no more victimised by mandatory abortion than by elective abortion. In either case, it is not a morally relevant entity with any interests invested in their continued existence. All I want to do is to take away the right to play God. And I'm not in favour of killing anyone who doesn't want to be killed, unless it's determined that omnicide is the only way to nip in the bud the perpetual cycle of imposition. Don't forget that a mass extinction is the eventual consequence of your views as well, but just imposed on a population that is temporally vastly removed from our own. So either natalism or antinatalism will result in the extinction of all life, but with antinatalism there would likely be less suffering involved. Certainly more so than the empty spaces where nothing resides. And certainly when against the will of the mother. And of course you're still rabidly insane with your "you fully support a woman's right to get an abortion just like those rabid evangelical Christians that oppose a woman's right to get an abortion". Part and parcel for your Ada brain, although I'm probably impugning Ada. And you don't get much more play(timing as a) psychopathic god than by dreaming of force sterilizing all women and mass murdering countless, among other predatory and highly irrational traits. And of course there's no reason there has to be mass extinction, except in the pathologically morbid minds that want their pathetic moany personal misery writ large.
Not at all, because it's better for me to suffer than for a greater number of people to suffer. |
|
