Mark Millar says the bulk of D.C. roster is not "Cinematic".

Mark Millar says the bulk of D.C. roster is not "Cinematic". Apr 4, 2018 15:37:52 GMT via mobile

Quote

Post by seahawksraawk00 on Apr 4, 2018 15:37:52 GMT

Apr 4, 2018 2:53:19 GMT DC-Fan said:

Apr 3, 2018 16:21:38 GMT PreachCaleb said:

Not true. We still see Clark/Superman's personality all throughout the movie, silliness not withstanding. It's Clark that carries the film, not the super powers.

Superman II also focuses on Clark's personality in regards to his feelings with Lois. In fact, he gives up his relationship with Lois to save the world. Mass consensus has already declared it a good movie. There is no disqualification.

Agreed. Superman II is a great movie because it deals with Clark wanting to have a normal life as Clark Kent but having to give that up because the world needed Superman. That's also why Spider-Man 2 is the best Spider-Man movie ever. Spider-Man 2 is similar to Superman II in that Peter Parker wanted to have a normal life but had to give that up because New York needed Spider-Man.

And that's also 1 of the best parts in Batman: Mask of the Phantasm, which had a great scene of Bruce Wayne at his parents grave and was torn inside because he had made a promise to his parents but he had fallen in love with Andrea Beaumont and he wanted to have a normal life.

And that's why MCU movies will never be as good as Superman II or Spider-Man 2.

Apr 3, 2018 16:21:38 GMT PreachCaleb said:

yes, WW had a strong supporting cast as all good movies do, but it still focused on her personality, which is the point.

Agreed.

Civil War has more depth than all the DC films combined