Post by cupcakes on Apr 4, 2018 19:29:34 GMT
tpfkar
Apr 3, 2018 17:44:01 GMT @miccee said:
And people who aren't terminal don't need kicking over the cliff, but treatment for their mental illnesses, or "brainwashing" as you like to shat.And your last para is just more of your pure cockeyed coo coo. Going on about the nonexistent that you don't go on about once again.
And getting what you can out of life before you're dirt, that peeps are overwhelmingly grateful for the opportunity for and overwhelmingly choose the up side as opposed to trivially easy exist, is about as distant as is possible from fairytales / your various religions including your current rabid nonsensical death cult.And to add to this, the people who give birth are the ones who are sentencing people to death in the first place
Right to die means just that. Most people who say that they support the right to die actually support the privilege to die under certain circumscribed circumstances. The right to die doesn't have such qualifications. Right to die means that everyone is entitled to their own body, and therefore law enforcement and emergency services would only have the right to prevent a suicide using force in the event that the suicide was going to endanger others (for example, someone jumping off a motorway bridge in front of oncoming traffic). It shouldn't be a 'right' only in the (non)sense that people can do it covertly, because if that's the definition of 'right' then homosexuals already had the right to homosexual sex before homosexuality was decriminalised.
A non-existent person isn't your victim, the person you forced into existence is your victim. And I am profoundly concerned about their wellbeing, even if caring about suffering and consent qualifies as psychopathy in your estimation.
People should have the right to free treatment for their mental illnesses, having such a right doesn't imply precluding a right to be supported in opting out of suffering altogether.
"Referencing" doesn't make any such "claim" except in the easy twittedness plopping out of an Ada mind. Right to die does not mean killing/facilitating the killing of the mentally ill for most, much less everybody. Regardless of how badly you want to conflate your murderously psychopathic views widely. Everybody has a right to off themselves, just don't act mentally ill and get people concerned enough to try to help protect you from your delusions/intoxications/illnesses/narcissisms, whatever. And I understand you have the self-loathing idea that homosexuality is harmful. 
Hope you manage to resolve that one day and get you some personal contact. You might want to try to suppress your ruminations of hook-ups with Arlon though. 
The nonexistent are not anything, and your idea to support consent by exterminating the extant against their or their mother's consent as opposed to allowing them to decide for themselves once they are competent just keeps delighting with the crazy funnies of the psychopathic playtime god.
Moreover, it may be possible to spray a chemical in the world's air, or add something to the water supply that would prevent women from becoming pregnant. It wouldn't be necessary to ban sex. Alternatively, we could develop an AI that would peacefully and swiftly wipe out all sentient organisms on Earth, perhaps by releasing some kind of toxin into the air.