|
|
Post by dazz on Apr 9, 2018 10:34:15 GMT
I don't think Snyder was as much the blame as people make out, I think it was the WB execs which is also why JL & SS suffered but Wonder Woman was able to shine, it had the least interference and Patty Jenkins for the most part was allowed to do what she wanted.
I mean imo MOS is a good film, there are certain issues I have with it, 2 being how Superman defeats Zod and also the making out between Superman & Lois amidst the destruction of metropolis, both of these imo are Snyder issues though imo, a lot of the other stuff feels like interference from a studio or a mandate, like it just makes more sense that it's an exec demanding these things, if it were just Snyder then SS shouldn't have had the same issues, and JL once Snyder was gone should have improved but from the sounds of things the Snyder version of JL was a better story, and we know Whedon can write good shit so it seems unlikely the problems in restructuring the film come from his end.
I think the restructuring of WB & DC Films is what will help the movies going forward not the removal of Zack Snyder, but I for one would love if the studio would use more of the comic writers even just as an outline group and then a QA for the script, that way they can bare bones a plot and then smooth over any rough spots in another writers story to fit the characters more, especially if they use writers who have had long associations with the characters the film is based on, doubt it will happen though as theres a stupid prejudice against comic writers in Hollywood it seems.
|
|