|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Apr 9, 2018 12:31:35 GMT
captainbryceThere's no reason to link convictions with the reality that men can be raped by women. The two have little to do with each other. So the exercise was silly. One can answer this: ...without any need to post charges/convictions even though some were easily made available to you. The problem is you are asking two separate questions and pretending they are connected. You are then still ignoring the correct answer to both when people are nice enough to explain it to you. Based off of your statements, at least the ones I read but apparently are unchanged, either you don't know the definition of rape or you have made up your own definition. Based off of your statements, at least the ones I read but apparently are unchanged, either you don't understand what a conviction is or t you have made up your own definition of a conviction. If you weren't already proven to be an odd duck, I would say you're being stupid and not providing a reason why you're being stupid on this. Fortunately, I'll just assume this is all a part of you being an odd duck.
|
|