Post by cupcakes on May 1, 2018 3:08:18 GMT
tpfkar
RED == what you clipped out. Well, a some of it anyway.
It's another of your many utterly irrelevant "mightbe"s that you arse-pulled in your advocacy of adult-kid sex.
It's you guys wanting the kids available for adult banging that have to overturn the kid-bits cart.
you published, that you noted repeatedly when you fielded youbglovechan's un-linked text list that you'd read NONE of. And in any case, utterly irrelevant except to those who'll fling any absurdity to get the kids available for sex to adults, until there's a consensus among the experts in the field - which they'll promulgate through other professionals, textbooks, teachers, media, laws, etc., of which we peeps will all be exposed (npi!) to from that distribution. Until then, it's just the wild hopes of the ever-conspiratorial jabbering adult-kid sex advocates.
First, from the Wikipedia bio link:
In 1973 he became Director of Research, Concord, Massachusetts Family Service Society. From 1973 to 1980 he was Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Tufts University, School of Medicine. Until 1987 he was Assistant Professor of Human Development and Family Studies (adjunct), University of Connecticut. From 1984 to 1986 he was also Clinical Supervisor, Adolescent and Family Intervention, LUK, Inc., Fitchburg, Mass.
...
Constantine trained under family therapy pioneers David Kantor and Fred and Bunny Duhl at the Boston Family Institute, completing a two-year post-graduate certificate program in 1973. From 1973 to 1980 he was an Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry in the Tufts University School of Medicine training family therapists and supervising trainees at Boston State Hospital. He became a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and later a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist in Massachusetts and was designated an Approved Supervisor by the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.
His contributions to theory and research in family therapy and human systems theory were summarized in Family Paradigms (Guilford Press, 1986), a book heralded at the time as “one of the finest theoretical books yet published in the family therapy field”[8] and “among the most significant developments of the decade.”[9] This work has also seen application in organization development.
...
Constantine trained under family therapy pioneers David Kantor and Fred and Bunny Duhl at the Boston Family Institute, completing a two-year post-graduate certificate program in 1973. From 1973 to 1980 he was an Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry in the Tufts University School of Medicine training family therapists and supervising trainees at Boston State Hospital. He became a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and later a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist in Massachusetts and was designated an Approved Supervisor by the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.
His contributions to theory and research in family therapy and human systems theory were summarized in Family Paradigms (Guilford Press, 1986), a book heralded at the time as “one of the finest theoretical books yet published in the family therapy field”[8] and “among the most significant developments of the decade.”[9] This work has also seen application in organization development.
The most important and consistent findings should not be in the least surprising, but many parents, as well as therapists, jurists, and social workers, express shocked disbelief when they hear it.
(1) There is a range of outcomes in both the short term effects and long term consequences. These range from clearly traumatic experiences which appear to have caused serious social and psychological impairment, through experiences in which no negative effects are discernible, to instances where the early sexual encounters were experienced as positive or appear to have been beneficial.
Two thirds of the studies reviewed at least some children who were unimpaired by their experiences or unaffected in any measurable or observable way. And a fifth of studies identified at least some children who seem to have been positively and/or who personally evaluated their experience as a positive/beneficial one...
(10) The most important determinant in the outcome of childhood incest or adult-child sexual encounters is the child's perception of freedom of choice in participating.
Not the nature of the activity, the age of the child, the structure of the incidents, or even the assessment of adult caretakers, is as important as whether or not the child felt free to participate or not in the sexual activity...
The research supports the notion that early sexual experiences of the kind being considered are not, in and of themselves, the causes of social or psychological impairment...
It is worth noting that nothing in the preceding summary supports the notion that child sexuality is in any fundamental way different from adult sexuality. The factors which emerge as important in differentiating more negative experiences of children from less negative ones are simply the same as ones which influence the outcomes of adult experiences...
Were we to base our legal structure on the scientific findings available now, it would have to distinguish three forms of participation by the child: unambiguously voluntary participation, where the child was clearly an initiator or willing and active participant in the sexual activities; unambiguously involuntary, where the use of force, threat of force, or other serious consequences or coercion precludes voluntary participation; and ambiguous participation, where the nature of the child's participation was unclear...
In non-peer sexual activities (not assault) where one or both participants is a minor, the perception of free choice of the younger partner would determine legal status. The determination would be made on the basis of the child's own testimony in an in-depth interview by a court-appointed professional. Where the younger partner is determined to have clearly and unambiguously participated willingly, in his or her own perception, then no crime would have been committed...
All cases of sexual activities between a minor and a person who is in a position of responsibility or authority over the minor would be treated as non-peer relationships. Unless it is determine beyond reasonable doubt by preliminary interview that the younger partner was clearly and unambiguously a willing participant, the presumption would be that the position of authority or responsibility was misused and a crime would be charged. The burden of proof that there was no misuse of position would shift to the accused. Where misuse of authority or responsibility is not then disproved, there would be an additional penalty for misuse of authority.
(1) There is a range of outcomes in both the short term effects and long term consequences. These range from clearly traumatic experiences which appear to have caused serious social and psychological impairment, through experiences in which no negative effects are discernible, to instances where the early sexual encounters were experienced as positive or appear to have been beneficial.
Two thirds of the studies reviewed at least some children who were unimpaired by their experiences or unaffected in any measurable or observable way. And a fifth of studies identified at least some children who seem to have been positively and/or who personally evaluated their experience as a positive/beneficial one...
(10) The most important determinant in the outcome of childhood incest or adult-child sexual encounters is the child's perception of freedom of choice in participating.
Not the nature of the activity, the age of the child, the structure of the incidents, or even the assessment of adult caretakers, is as important as whether or not the child felt free to participate or not in the sexual activity...
The research supports the notion that early sexual experiences of the kind being considered are not, in and of themselves, the causes of social or psychological impairment...
It is worth noting that nothing in the preceding summary supports the notion that child sexuality is in any fundamental way different from adult sexuality. The factors which emerge as important in differentiating more negative experiences of children from less negative ones are simply the same as ones which influence the outcomes of adult experiences...
Were we to base our legal structure on the scientific findings available now, it would have to distinguish three forms of participation by the child: unambiguously voluntary participation, where the child was clearly an initiator or willing and active participant in the sexual activities; unambiguously involuntary, where the use of force, threat of force, or other serious consequences or coercion precludes voluntary participation; and ambiguous participation, where the nature of the child's participation was unclear...
In non-peer sexual activities (not assault) where one or both participants is a minor, the perception of free choice of the younger partner would determine legal status. The determination would be made on the basis of the child's own testimony in an in-depth interview by a court-appointed professional. Where the younger partner is determined to have clearly and unambiguously participated willingly, in his or her own perception, then no crime would have been committed...
All cases of sexual activities between a minor and a person who is in a position of responsibility or authority over the minor would be treated as non-peer relationships. Unless it is determine beyond reasonable doubt by preliminary interview that the younger partner was clearly and unambiguously a willing participant, the presumption would be that the position of authority or responsibility was misused and a crime would be charged. The burden of proof that there was no misuse of position would shift to the accused. Where misuse of authority or responsibility is not then disproved, there would be an additional penalty for misuse of authority.
I say I'll read, paste back in the stuff you clip, and excoriate your latest frantic adult-kid "sex" advocacy Hail Mary in the morning. You come by then and get your copy for Word!Eva Yojimbo: And what "facts already established by experts" are you referring to? What would you say in response to someone posting a list of pro-to-neutral studies of pedophilia like THESE? Now, I haven't read any of them, and neither have you; but I'm also guessing that you (like myself) have done zero actual research into the subject in general. All you're doing is basing this on your gut reactions and social mores, reactions and mores that history has taught us are remarkably unreliable.