Post by cupcakes on May 2, 2018 12:11:30 GMT
tpfkar
adult-kid sex advocacy ...
No, you just keep dumping Hail Mary "mightbe"s in your rabid advocacy. You give yourself away again with both "experts don't have a hive mind" and again suggesting that experts are keeping you and youglovechan from the kid lovin' that they know is wonderful, because of fear for their careers. And you then of course voluminously quibble-cavil divert like any pinned reach-for-any-arsepull highly-invested advocate on how them sitting on all of the great of your adult-kid sex is not "cowardice", it's just lying out of fear. ::keeppouringthesh!t:: Just like your hilarious hiss of "lie" on it matches your comical wet flaccid denials of your adult-kid sex wants even as you furiously shovel rank lies about of why your frantically-wanted adult-kid sex is prohibited. Much like you couldn't even have a consistent line in your furiously-heaved ludicrous adult-kid sex advocacy, first accusing "dishonesty" over and over, and then tossing in your arsepulled "moral outrage" Hail Mary, like that even means anything - people are "morally outraged" at all kinds of nasty that empathy-broken frantically jabbering freaks want, see businesses refusing service based on race or sexual orientation, or the Tuskegee experiments, or HITLER!
Ahhh, your nonsense. Followed by "Puritanism", the completely out-the-butt "xenophobia"
and whatever other motivated bullsh!t for why your wanted adult-kid sex greenlighting is not happening. And silly frantic stuff like a 30+ years old article by a guy that subsequently moved to engineering that says absolutely nothing relevant, that you dug up and "read" 9+ months after your boneheaded oily assertions in your adult-kid sex advocacy. Speaking of your ludicrous exhortations of "research" you say that lay people have to do to negate the promulgated expert (those cursed truth-burying experts!
) consensus, research that you blared repeatedly that you didn't do, and dumped text listings of vapor studies (that you also blared that you hadn't read!) from "younglovechan", that you said others have to weigh against the career-concerned lies
of the not-coward-just-so-fearful-they-lie-about-your-wonderful-wonderful-adult-kid-sex experts. Talk about fanciful burdens.
And it's not your oft-peddled pathetic "reading comprehension" vacuity, it's empathy-disabled armchair-amateur utter freaks who think that they can carry through any kid-abusing lunatic view by dumping enough sh!tloads of silly lies, utter irrelevancies, and absolute farcical frantic nonsensicalities. In this case in order to push adult-kid sex and then act "aghast" and repeatedly beg for help when their pathetic, repeated, determined psychopathy is pointed out.
And those arguing for their wanted adult-kid sex do have the burden, regardless of how much you go round and round ad infinitum with your great nemesis Arlon.
Too bad, no kid-lovin' sad.
And as ludicrous as he is, at least he's not frantic to get into the kids' pants. And you're presenting the likes of a 30+ year-old article, a book review, an Amazon ad for a book, the best of which you can get out of is that some % of victims self-report no harm or their positive outlook on being abused as a child by an adult (SHOCKING DISCOVERY - family ties and Stockholm syndrome and pedophilia in victims of pedophilia were heretofore unknown of) as if that means anything concerning your adult-kid sex wants or the argument in which you voluminously jabber-revealed it in your preposterous defenses, rife with epithets, free lies and utter ludicrousness, of a specific consent regime in which a child, be it toddler, prepubescent, etc., or as you guys like to think of, a slab of meat to jam into, merely has to articulate want in order for the adult to be able to use that child for "sex".
IMDB2.freeforums.net/thread/42182/ot-child-robots?q=vast
IMDB2.freeforums.net/thread/42182/ot-child-robots?q=bulk
Regardless of all your comically nattering, utterly dishonest, massively irrelevant, rife with frantic irrationality advocacy, people generally follow what's been promulgated by the experts, and your adult-kid sex dreams will remain just one of the many things you missing-brain-bits crazies think you can talk your way to acceptance of with reams of twisted bullsh!t. Don't let the "Puritans" get you down jabber-man.

And or course, still, any day

IMDB2.freeforums.net/post/695598/thread
IMDB2.freeforums.net/post/710299/thread
IMDB2.freeforums.net/post/693442/thread
Eva Yojimbo: And what "facts already established by experts" are you referring to? What would you say in response to someone posting a list of pro-to-neutral studies of pedophilia like THESE? Now, I haven't read any of them, and neither have you; but I'm also guessing that you (like myself) have done zero actual research into the subject in general. All you're doing is basing this on your gut reactions and social mores, reactions and mores that history has taught us are remarkably unreliable.
