|
|
Post by deembastille on May 2, 2018 22:59:26 GMT
deembastille Oh, she knows what the case is about. But, she won't let anyone speak or express themselves. She interrupts. ("Just a second.") I've always felt that she LEADS the litigants to say what SHE wants them to say, so she can rule the way she wants to. In many cases, I think she has her mind made up before her ass even hits the chair. I also think she's wrong in REFUSING to hear parts of their claims. She doesn't "do" pots and pans and household items. ("Her parents didn't send her to college for that.") Why not? That's what she's there for. If I felt I was cheated out of something, the claim should at least be heard.  It annoys me to no end when she refuses to consider certain parts of a claim, like pots and pans. Okay, in her world--where you make $45M a year for sitting in a pretend court on TV--pots and pans may seem trivial. But in the real world, where people have to use their hard-earned money to pay for things like that, it can be a very big deal. My live-in helper and her boyfriend work hard but are always broke. If they went to court and included something like pots and pans in their claim, I assure you that would be a big deal to them as they don't have the spare money to buy replacements. Ugh. i get where you are coming from but you can buy pots and pans at target and get general run of the mill pots and pans. one usually doesn't NEED a copper pot unless you are Martha steward. and.... many of the people on judge judy claim these things because they over spend and over extend themselves. i make 13hundred dollars a month... how many movies can i buy on pay perview with that? damn. i need to feed my kid... oh well...
|
|