|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on May 3, 2018 2:18:28 GMT
tpfkar Speaking of going "Full Cupcakes.," this is one giant honking ad hominem that has abandoned any pretense of actually addressing the points. Please keep up the libel, because it's going to land you on the bannedwagon sooner rather than later.  Pertinent truths of course are not "ad hominem"s, and I answered every one of your twitted point-skipping, point-clipping "points", both in the reply and numerous times prior, regardless of yet another your vacuous point-avoiding hissy fits. And as bad as you adult-kid sex advocates beg for protection from your raw advocacy, rank lies, voluminous irrelevant diversions, and other utterly ludicrous tactics being pointed out, the truth is an absolute defense of twisted babygirl howls of "libel". I do know where you'd end up on it in any civil suit, any day. 
Eva Yojimbo: If you're raised in an environment where Jews are considered inferior, then it's very easy to just blindly accept that without ever questioning it. I mean, did YOU do any research into what the experts thought about pedophilia before arguing in these threads? I know I didn't. There are no truths. You wouldn't know the truth if it sliced open your head with a katana and did a cannonball dive into your brain. There's just the messy combination of your lies, abysmal reading comprehension, poor memory, active imagination, complete lack of logic and rationality, etc. Again, the only one who's posted actual studies by actual experts is me. The only one who's actually insulted actual experts (based on nothing but ass-pulled "mightbe"s) is you. The only one who's claimed they know the expert consensus and failed to post it is you. The only one who’s displayed a gross ignorance about how science and “experts” work is you. That's the "pertinent truth." There's literally no point in continuing to debate someone who can't grasp the most basic points that anyone makes, and keeps claiming they've advocated and claimed stuff they haven't. If you seriously think a court would rule in your favor then you're insane. Your entire argument amounts to the same thing as saying "if you're in favor of homosexual marriage then you're gay." Of course, the entire forum has failed to explain that simple point to you in the past. |
|
