Post by Isapop on Jun 9, 2018 20:19:39 GMT
Regarding the examples the narrator gives of "Christian hypocrisy" (acceptance of homosexuality, acceptance of more than one "path"):
Since the Christians accused don't conceal their views, but rather proclaim them, they cannot be guilty of hypocrisy, but would be guilty (from the narrator's point of view) of apostasy.
You'd think that someone appointing himself a Christian commentator would have learned the difference.
He even provided the standard definition of hypocrisy...”Someone who says they have particular moral beliefs but behaves in a way that shows these are not sincere”.
And the fact that they publicly reject the "traditional" Christian view of homosexuality means that they have abandoned that teaching and qualify (from the narrator's view) as apostates.
Your narrator is ignorant.