Post by ThatGuy on Jun 10, 2018 19:15:06 GMT
No, Spider-man was the doorway. But the Raimi Spider-man movies has that campy/corny-ness to them.
How is Iron Man more comic booky than the X-men movies? If they made Iron Man, I don't think they would have gone as far as Favreau did. Yeah, they pulled back when it came to The Mandarin, but think about all the pull backs we got from the X-men movies.
And I wasn't really criticizing the X-men movies, but the people around it and their views on it and also giving a time frame. Back in those days we wanted CBMs to be closer to the comics, but at the same time, not overly corny/campy. People felt that the movies would have to be corny and campy for them to be like the comics and that you had to change them to be in live action or they would come out like Batman Forever/ & Robin and the like. Nobody thought that if you made the movies in earnest and had the characters believe in what they were doing that it would come out great. When the characters don't think that what they were doing (the costumes and such) was stupid then they audience won't. People behind the movies at that time, had audiences believing that you had to be moody and wearing dark leather for the movies to work. Either that or go Raimi (which was just his style anyway). The MCU is that middle ground between those worlds and it works and people respond to it.
I'd really like to see a DC movie made like an MCU movie. The current DC movies are trying to be so anti-MCU that they go against their own characters.