Post by palerider on Jun 21, 2018 11:56:20 GMT
James Manigold is an upstart who had one small success and now lets it get to his head. He shows the problem with a big-headed "auteur" director getting involved in a group project...they don't want to play with others and see the big picture, they just want complete control over the one story they're doing with no respect for anyone else.
I mean really, Logan was no different from all the Charles Bronson/Clint Eastwood movies that were all over the place in the 70s and 80s.
Disney's way isn't perfect (blaming them for Star Wars is silly, because the people making those movies are the Lucasfilm employees who came over from Lucasfilm. Lucas' own people) but their way offers a more interesting, inventive approach than self-contained, one-shot films.
Marvel was built on the characters interacting with one another, not being separate.
I mean really, Logan was no different from all the Charles Bronson/Clint Eastwood movies that were all over the place in the 70s and 80s.
Disney's way isn't perfect (blaming them for Star Wars is silly, because the people making those movies are the Lucasfilm employees who came over from Lucasfilm. Lucas' own people) but their way offers a more interesting, inventive approach than self-contained, one-shot films.
Marvel was built on the characters interacting with one another, not being separate.