Post by alpha128 on Jun 21, 2018 12:40:21 GMT
But neither should Star Wars fans! J.J. Abrams said that: ‘Star Wars’ Fans Who Didn’t Like ‘Last Jedi’ Are ‘Threatened’ By Women Characters.
Oh, the people bitching about a female lead?
If one had a solid excuse obviously the comment wasnt aimed at you. It was directed at all the people bitching about a black storm trooper & how a girl would not be able to beat Kylo because girls are weaker than boys.
How is it bullying (fans for voicing valid objections to their movies)?
As Alex Becker also notes below, Lucasfilm and their defenders paint the fan base with a broad brush. The clear implication is that anyone who did not like TLJ or who boycotted Solo, did so because they were racist, sexist, misogynist, etc.
I dont have to like JJ Abrams's words. What matters is do I like his films?
I read J.J. Abrams comment as an attack on all detractors of TLJ. Like he was saying loud and clear, "I do not want your money for Episode IX." Well guess what? He's not getting mine!
On the other hand, TLJ was on top of the 2017 releases.
2017 WORLDWIDE GROSSES
1-Star Wars: The Last Jedi $1,332.5 $620.2 46.5% $712.4 53.5%
2017 WORLDWIDE GROSSES
1-Star Wars: The Last Jedi $1,332.5 $620.2 46.5% $712.4 53.5%
True, but TFA grossed $735.7 million more than TLJ ($2,068.2 vs. $1,332.5). This gives TLJ the record for biggest ever sequel-to-sequel plunge.
No doubt pent-up demand for "Star Wars" played a large part in TFA's box office haul. But a significant part of TLJ's sequel-to-sequel plunge was due to a lack of repeat business - because about 50% of viewers hated the movie. I suppose we shouldn't be surprised, since Rian Johnson has stated he wants 50% of viewers to hate his movies:

