|
|
Post by NishmatHaChalil on Mar 26, 2017 19:58:31 GMT
And accepting that you have the physical body you have. Not accepting that is having it surgically altered. Actually, no, it isn't. People are born with many defects, conditions or other morphological characteristics that can be altered surgically. Neither science nor they nor any movement that fights for their rights see that as who they are. OK, some other people, like you, and J's Ws, do, but your misguided definitions of who they are don't matter when their rights are concerned. J's Ws don't accept transfusions due to their personal, irrational beliefs. You don't accept SRs. Neither of you matter when healthcare for other people is concerned, but you both are free not to undergo the operations you don't accept yourselves. There is nothing wrong whatsoever with altering our bodies surgically. However, not accepting something in your body is not the same as having this part altered surgically. If it was, we would be undergoing immediate magical surgeries all the time. For any surgery at all to be performed, it must before be evaluated by a surgical professional, and, following the right criteria, it's always done with the endorsement of the medical community. SRs is actually so well employed that it not only demands a previous surgical evaluation, but also a psychological one. So, in fact, it's actually above average in this regard!
|
|