|
|
Post by telegonus on Jul 8, 2018 4:31:02 GMT
Can't say for sure about the mills used in the film, but US steel production has suffered badly since the Vietnam War. When I moved to Chicago in 1980 there were several mills operating on the South Side along the lake – Wisconsin Steel, Republic, US Steel.... One by one they closed. There were only one or two still going along the Indiana shore when I left in '95. Whiting and Gary?
Sounds very much like the slow and painful decline of heavy industry here in England. New England also, Petro.  My family, both sides, is from the Merrimack Valley, which was in its heyday, the Lancashire of the U.S. More generally, so was the region of New England as a whole. Every major river had textile mills, it seems, from Rhode Island and Connecticut through Massachusetts, right into Maine. Luckily, the end of an era has not killed off employment here, and most of the six N.E. states are on the upswing now economically, with a couple of exceptions. Downside: fewer jobs, gentrification (pushing out multi-generational residents, many of them lower skilled working people), an increasingly affluent and skilled population, much of it drawn from other states and now, more and more, other countries. Good for them.
It's a mixed blessing for locals, and for many not a blessing at all. On the other hand, those red brick mills have been, in many places, saved, fixed up, have been turned into museums or new housing for artists and craftspeople. That part of it isn't so bad. Textiles may not qualify as heavy industry, as such. I'm not sure about that. It was certainly labor-intensive, as was the shoe industry which in many places replaced it. This was once a heavily industrial region, though, and for a while New England flirted with becoming an automotive manufacturing center, but Detroit and the Great Lakes states were better equipped for that kind of very heavy manufacturing. We didn't really have the space for that here.
|
|