|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jul 9, 2018 13:58:20 GMT
Yes. Again, the idea is that kls responded to me with the old "Who are you to tell me what I have to accept/what I can do/etc." The fact is that she's often fine with other people telling her what she has to accept/what she can do. If she weren't fine with that, then she'd basically be pro anarchy/against any basic rules to follow as you put it. Or in other words, "Who are you to tell me what I have to accept/what I can do/etc." doesn't work as an objection unless we're talking to someone who is an anarchist. You're totally missing the point. I certainly will accept people telling me not to touch them if they don't want me to. Then you shouldn't present an objection a la "who are you to tell me what I have to accept/what I can and can't do" You don't have a problem with that categorically. (That is, across the board.)
|
|