Post by MCDemuth on Jul 9, 2018 22:54:21 GMT
I think most people who hate the Star Wars prequels don't know what they are talking about...
Did We Really?
HEY FUCKING "MORONS"... LUCAS CHANGED THINGS EVEN BEFORE THE PREQUELS...
Just for starters:
In "A New Hope"
Darth Vader killed Anakin.
Luke & Leia were not related.
In "Return Of The Jedi"
Anakin became Darth Vader
Luke & Leia were Fraternal Twins.
And you guys are only blaming "The Prequels" for changes? ROTFWL!
ALL Lucas did was constantly change things from "Empire Strikes Back" On!
To be honest here, I am actually amazed at how well Lucas was able to get everything he started out doing with "The Phantom Menace" to wrap up with "Revenge Of The Sith" and have it all still flow pretty nicely into "A New Hope"...
That's the problem with a prequel... The end of the film, has to tie in with the first...
And So, we all knew that Anakin would become Darth Vader, and Obi-Wan and Yoda would not be killed... That actually took away from some of my enjoyment of some of "Revenge Of The Sith"... Because I knew they would survive the Jedi Massacre... I just didn't know, HOW...
For the most part, I liked the Star Wars Prequel Films...
However, As I said, the thing I don't like about most prequels, is because they partly give away the ending... Certain Things have to happen, such as: Characters not being in mortal danger, in order to set up the first movie...
More often than not, when another movie, especially trilogies, are created, writers always want to do something "NEW"... and in this case they came up with stuff like: "Midichlorians" (or however it's spelled). They should have left much of that stuff out... but it wasn't unexpected.
I really can't think of any Prequel that I have seen, where it wasn't different, in someway, than how the history was presented in the first film.
I think people should quit bashing the Star Wars Prequel Films... As to how they were written... and just say, they should never have been made because they were... "Prequels".
Oddly, it seems the "sequels" are actually worse, than the "prequels"...
Perhaps we should be grateful, that Lucas didn't have Obi-Wan killed in "The Phantom Menace", and then, had him resurrected in "Revenge Of The Sith" so that he could train Luke in "A New Hope"... Now that really would have been a mind fuck.
We already knew the story
Did We Really?
even with that Lucas decided to change it like a moron.
HEY FUCKING "MORONS"... LUCAS CHANGED THINGS EVEN BEFORE THE PREQUELS...
Just for starters:
In "A New Hope"
Darth Vader killed Anakin.
Luke & Leia were not related.
In "Return Of The Jedi"
Anakin became Darth Vader
Luke & Leia were Fraternal Twins.
And you guys are only blaming "The Prequels" for changes? ROTFWL!
ALL Lucas did was constantly change things from "Empire Strikes Back" On!
To be honest here, I am actually amazed at how well Lucas was able to get everything he started out doing with "The Phantom Menace" to wrap up with "Revenge Of The Sith" and have it all still flow pretty nicely into "A New Hope"...
That's the problem with a prequel... The end of the film, has to tie in with the first...
And So, we all knew that Anakin would become Darth Vader, and Obi-Wan and Yoda would not be killed... That actually took away from some of my enjoyment of some of "Revenge Of The Sith"... Because I knew they would survive the Jedi Massacre... I just didn't know, HOW...
For the most part, I liked the Star Wars Prequel Films...
However, As I said, the thing I don't like about most prequels, is because they partly give away the ending... Certain Things have to happen, such as: Characters not being in mortal danger, in order to set up the first movie...
More often than not, when another movie, especially trilogies, are created, writers always want to do something "NEW"... and in this case they came up with stuff like: "Midichlorians" (or however it's spelled). They should have left much of that stuff out... but it wasn't unexpected.
I really can't think of any Prequel that I have seen, where it wasn't different, in someway, than how the history was presented in the first film.
I think people should quit bashing the Star Wars Prequel Films... As to how they were written... and just say, they should never have been made because they were... "Prequels".
Oddly, it seems the "sequels" are actually worse, than the "prequels"...
Perhaps we should be grateful, that Lucas didn't have Obi-Wan killed in "The Phantom Menace", and then, had him resurrected in "Revenge Of The Sith" so that he could train Luke in "A New Hope"... Now that really would have been a mind fuck.