|
|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2018 23:17:19 GMT
You are totally and wilfully missing the point here and ignoring what kls says. It is all about choice in how we decide our bodily autonomy. She already said that in matters of safety and health that we have the freedom to weigh up costs, risks and benefits. In the case you keep referring to one decides whether the submission to regulation regarding perceived violation of our bodily autonomy at the airport is worth the benefit of travelling on the aircraft at that time and all that it involves. You are being disingenuous. You're not understanding my point. Does she ever let anyone else decide what she can and can't do with her body, including places she can and can't go, where she can and can't park a car, etc.? No. She chooses whether to obey/follow laws, regulations, restrictions, guidelines, morals etc. as outlined above. Choice followed by consequences of action taken. I seriously suggest you look up the United Nations', human rights. It outlines this concept. Just because it is not always followed does not make it invalid.
|
|