|
|
Post by amyghost on Jul 18, 2018 21:22:13 GMT
No, you're espousing the notion that, as long as someone posits themselves as a 'victim' their rights should be paramount--and the accused should have no rights that need be respected whatsoever, not even the right to face their accuser and attempt to prove their innocence. If there's so many victims and witnesses then they definitely have rights, but you're actually against them having any. Huh. Really? Quote specifically where I've said this. You won't be able to because I haven't, nor have I suggested anything like that idea. All you're doing is standard boilerplate for someone who's marinated their brain in group-think hysterics: place your words in your opponent's mouth and then keep insisting that those are their words, rather than your transplanted ones. Because you've so innoculated yourself against the ability to think critically, you simply expect all onlookers are as incapable of critical thought themselves, and will buy into the trick. Because it makes you comfortable to be a lemming, don't imagine that it suits everyone else to be one as well. |
|
