|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 28, 2017 12:51:44 GMT
I wouldn't say that a prisoner who rapes or has consensual sex with another male prisoner because his choice is limited is homosexual, or even necessarily bisexual. You're only homosexual if you have a choice of either a male or female lover, and you would prefer a male lover. "Homosexual is just a sex act" seems a lot like the rhetoric that homophobic Christians use to justify denying the rights of homosexuals. I agree with this whole post. And there are many examples and instances of situational sex that have no bearing on a person's sexual orientation.Are you gay? A person who is willing to perform a sex act with the same gender has tapped into their homosexual tendencies and want to do it. If they also screw women, they are then "bisexual". Bluto in prison may not be attractive enough anyway, and has to rape and force his way onto another dude. This could be about power and control, but ultimately, if he is going to rape another guy, he could just as easily do it with another guy on the outside. Most of these guys are dense anyway and are just following a social conditioning of what is "perceived" as normal and that is heterosexuality. If it is easier for them to live life f<>king females, then that is what they will do. If a gay guy was in a long term situation with just women around, would he want to f<>k them? I sure as hell wouldn't and can't. If he does, then he is "bisexual". It's simple! The same can also be said then about men around men. If they want to f<>k another man, it's because they want to and are attracted to it sexually. One cannot really fuck with out sexual desire and arousal.
|
|