|
|
Post by dazz on Jul 30, 2018 7:50:48 GMT
This guy has some really screwed up criteria for rating movies! Who in their right mind would rate Fantastic Four over Black Panther? Fantastic Four was infinitely worse. FF was like 80 minutes of drawn out origin stories. And then the last ten or fifteen minutes was actually about action and conflict between the heroes and the villain. Even the real plot to the conflict didn't really show up till shortly before that. And that wasn't even that good. A forgettable final battle full of forgettable action. Could you imagine if they did that in Wonder Woman? The first 80 or 90 minutes is devoted to Diana growing up on that island and getting training. Then the last ten or fifteen minutes they try to cram in the story of her fighting in World War One and finding Aries and battling him? This guy is getting so bad at movie criteria - at this point I can just guess the opposite of what he says will actually be the case. DC-Fan uses a "unbiased" and "fair" system where he scores films from 1-10 and they receive points based on what things are or are not included in them, the Marvel Studios logo for example is a -1000 score, a DC Logo is +10, and other such things, he then divides that number by a number the film acculturates for various things such a 1 point for every DC major character 0.1 for every secondary DC character, 10 for any Marvel Studios owned character, bonus 10 if that character has their own movie, and 5 points for any non MCU owned Marvel character, then he rounds it to the closest whole number...it's very fair and unbiased as he likes to tell us all...that or he's a tosser take yah pick.
|
|