|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Mar 28, 2017 21:53:59 GMT
I think "asexual", is more along the lines of just abstinence. The desires are still there. Some people's sex drive might be stronger the next, but there are way too many labels and tags for sexuality today and it is getting out of hand. People just want to appear cool or trendy. Yes, very narcissistic. I don't care whether other's want to f<>k or not, I just believe in "asexuality" as being a misnomer. Abstinence is a different matter from asexuality, because that's a behaviour and a lifestyle choice. Asexuality is basically not having the desire to have sex. Since I am sexually aroused by men, that would make me homosexual. But lack of companionship is what bothers me; not the fact that I don't have someone to attend to my sexual urges. I think that I would easily be able to accept a romantic relationship where there was no penetrative sex involved. Since you are sexually aroused by men, then you still have sexual desires. That does not make you asexual. It is also your body mic. You need to make up the rules for it and what you do and don't want. That needs to be respected by your partner. If somebody doesn't want to be with you, it shouldn't be because you don't want penetrative sex. That is not necessary and is not what "sex" comprises of. That might just be more along the lines of base f<>king. |
|
