|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 29, 2017 4:38:56 GMT
Sony execs recently stated that After a sequel to Homecoming, and two more appearances in Infinity War, it may be difficult for a crossover between companies to ever work again. And yes, this means they may very well be unwilling to keep sharing the character.
But what does that really mean?
I mean it's a negotiation tactic. I have no doubt that Sony is fully willing and capable of running with their own independent series and reclaiming sole rights to Spiderman, but I doubt they'd pass up the opportunity to find out what Marvel is willing to pay to retain rights to use the character. The question would be to what extent Marvel would entertain a negotiation, and if Sony is only interested in top dollar and nothing less.
To me, the smart thing Sony should do is design a spiderverse that works with the MCU so that it's movies can be entirely independent, but still have the capability for some crossover appearances from time to time, just not to the extent that occurs with the other MCU movies. The solo Venom flick for instance, would automatically sell more tickets and DVD's if it has at least some relation to the MCU, even if that is vague and undefined, than if it had no connection whatsoever. Yeah, honestly I doubt Sony is stupid enough to risk killing off the goose that's laying them the golden eggs. I think Sony just wants a bigger share of pie, but even then they probably are well aware that Marvel has far more leverage than they do. Wouldn't be surprised if what happens is that "Venom" and other possible Spider-Man spinoffs are made to be more or less part of the MCU, but pretty much on their own like "Deadpool" was with the X-Men. And honestly I'd be fine with that. I wouldn't mind at all Sony producing a very loosely connected set of films that you could include with the MCU if you wanted to, but they largely did their own thing. All they have to do is not contradict anything. Other than that, they could do what they wanted to.
|
|