The Atheist Experience

   I'll admit that your understanding of the meaning of words, rules of debate, and logic is so tenuous it can be difficult to guess what you're about.  How's that?

   Meanwhile, I'd appreciate it if you would show an example of exactly how you "attempted to show that their reasons were not good ones" while lacking a belief since the example I gave is one that I'm certain never occurred on this board before.  (It does show how good I am at guessing though.)  Or perhaps you have a link.  Should there be several different examples?  If you have no examples of your own, wouldn't you be the liar here?

   I would also appreciate you admitting that when I was taught in school who has the burden of proof that it was a good school.

   For the benefit of any others here, I will note that what has happened most often in these cases is that atheists and theists have disagreed more on the definition of a god than the existence of one. That is something else I said several years ago.  Atheists find it easy to assert that a god who gives anyone who asks a million dollars does not exist, but that is not the god any theists (that I know) believe in.  They know it's more complicated than that.  Do I exaggerate?  For clarity I do, but there is the point.  The difference is over the definition of a god, not its existence.  The "logic" of atheists is more of a failure to gather any meaning.

   Notice that when confronted with three concepts of a god in the linked article that have been made somewhat immune to such misinterpretation the atheists are silent.

   I am not your foe, @graham , but I fear that clear thinking and writing are.