Disney strikes again!?

We're not doing your lame attempt at backing out the instant you realized you've lost. Furthermore, it has everything to do with the historicity of Shakespeare, because a original plays written for a specific theater have to take a great number of factors into consideration. The person who wrote Shakespeare's plays would have to be intimately familiar with the theater company in question, called the King's Men, via being a member of it and working the other employees on a daily basis.
In Shakespeare's case, he was also an actor and a manager at the theater, which gives him especially intimate knowledge of the company's assets. To expand on that, the playwright would have to know the numbers in the company's budget, earnings, and know their chances of getting more funds if need be. They would have to take stock on pre-existing costumes, sets, and props, and IF the company could make or purchase anything new for the play. The parts were written for specific actors with specific strengths and weaknesses, so the playwright would have worked closely with them for many years and be familiar with them to cast them correctly. The writer also had to know what their usual customers liked to see at their theater, another thing specifically about their company to take into account.

So far, the requirements compiled are:
-knowing the budget, earnings, and prospects of attaining more funding
-knowing the actors
-knowing the technical aspects in and out
-knowing the audience

So what happens if a play is written by an outsider who doesn't have this very specific wealth of knowledge? A play that has to be tossed out or heavily re-written by the people who work there until it fits within their capabilities. The assumption that someone else wrote Shakespeare's plays for him creates more busywork and hoops to jump through than the simplest and most logical conclusion: William Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare.