Since Gunn is Gone For Good Now, Shouldn't Feige Make A Statement ?
Aug 16, 2018 15:46:15 GMT
DC-Fan likes this
Post by Tristan's Journal on Aug 16, 2018 15:46:15 GMT
I think the immediate, unapologetic and clear "tone from the top" termination and condemnation as "indefensible" says it all and there is little to add. They cut out the malignant tumor; who knows what else is comming.
My caveat: Was it not Marvel Studeos/Feige who hired Gunn...thereby neglegting to do the proper HR/DD screenings? They obviously knew of the Gunn's homophobic and sexist content on Gunn's website - for which Gunn had to apologise in 2012. But they seem not to have had any clue about his countless child rape commnents on Twitter/photos/videos etc, or they would have made him apologise for this disgusting content too (if not a deal breaker per se)?
Feige's awkward and ambiguous silence on Gunn's depraved output is not a sign of strong leadership, corporate culture or the necessary "tone from the top". It's a sign of weakness.
My caveat: Was it not Marvel Studeos/Feige who hired Gunn...thereby neglegting to do the proper HR/DD screenings? They obviously knew of the Gunn's homophobic and sexist content on Gunn's website - for which Gunn had to apologise in 2012. But they seem not to have had any clue about his countless child rape commnents on Twitter/photos/videos etc, or they would have made him apologise for this disgusting content too (if not a deal breaker per se)?
Feige's awkward and ambiguous silence on Gunn's depraved output is not a sign of strong leadership, corporate culture or the necessary "tone from the top". It's a sign of weakness.