Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2018 23:24:05 GMT
Aug 16, 2018 22:52:54 GMT @thegodfather said:
Aug 16, 2018 19:48:30 GMT @graham said:
Couldn't you say just as much for actors?I mean, Sean Connery was the first 007. Why let Lazenby or Moore or any other actor play it? Just make up a new spy if you want them to have work.
Same for Sherlock Holmes. Basil Rathbone is Sherlock, why let Benedict Cummerbund or Robert Downey Jr play him? (I'm sure somebody probably pre-dates Rathbone, so substitute him.)
And so on. Why let Pine play Kirk? Why let anybody but Adam West play Batman?
Is that your point of view?
Stop being petty. You know what I mean.
No, I really don't. I don't understand why it is that you'd be okay with going from Connery to Lazenby, but not from Craig to Elba.
Okay. Then I want to see Henry Cavill play Black Panther in a remake. He makes a better superhero imho.
Imagine that.
Or let's recast Wonder Woman with a man.
Imagine that.
Or let's recast Wonder Woman with a man.
Bond, however, is not a character whose colour is especially important. He's from a country with both men and women of many different colours and ethnicities. It's perfectly reasonable that he could be black, or anything else.
Now if you were making a biopic of, oh, say Nathan Bedford Forrest, then I'd be the first to say that you couldn't reasonably cast a black man in that role; it would make no more sense than a white Black Panther. Nor could you reasonably cast a black Lincoln.
But when the race isn't important? Take... oh, say Idris Elba's character in Pacific Rim. There's no particular plot-related reason why he should be black, he just happened to be. If Pacific Rim were remade, there'd be no reason not to put a white, asian, female or other character into that role.
So no, I'm afraid I still don't see your point. Perhaps you would care to explain it : why must Bond be white?