|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Aug 21, 2018 8:03:11 GMT
FF: if apparently only a 'mutually agreed and arbitrary' definition is something you recognise, how would you ever know whether I am correct or not if we don't agree and the standard definitions I refer to are not arbitrary?
Or, given the grounds upon which you plan your famous copyrighted appeal [of the Dover verdict] ... Perhaps if you admitted you were a Christian it might help the backing along? Arlon: No. And why would either of these things not be the case? I am only following your reasoning (if you don't recognise definitions of something, how can you know what it is or isn't?) and consequences of lack of candour (if you don't admit to your Christianity, then how can you expect intellectual support from committed fundamentalists?). Remember how personal insults and condescension do not an argument make? This is still the case. LOL
|
|