One of my managers is a 9/11 truther.

One of my managers is a 9/11 truther. Sept 3, 2018 22:45:41 GMT deembastille likes this

Quote

Post by lenlenlen1 on Sept 3, 2018 22:45:41 GMT

Sept 1, 2018 23:11:54 GMT @angryincelasianloser said:

Sept 1, 2018 16:57:20 GMT lenlenlen1 said:

Your understanding of physics is flawed in this instance. One cannot compare a tree to the twin towers. Even the largest trees in the world never reached the height and weight of the twin towers.

The fire didn't ONLY damage the buildings structure with its actual burning capability. It also damaged the buildings structure with the tremendous HEAT it generated. If it was JUST the burning, the building might not have fallen. But the heat actually made the beams and internal structure "wobbly", not quite "melting", but on its way towards that.

So there was this huge part of the middle of each building that was in that wobbly almost melted state. The upper part no longer had support and fell on the lower part which fell under the sudden weight and kinetic energy. All the weight that was above the "70th floor" you mention was more that enough to do the trick.

I don't see why that's hard to believe.

the building fell as a whole, as one mass. If you look at the video, you should notice the lower floors also begin to fall at the same time as the entire building begins to fall.

If you mean THIS video...

...THAT video is A) not depicting one of the twin towers, and B) I am willing to admit that this LOOKS like a building when it falls from demolition, and that maybe, MAYBE, that particular building was demolished because it was too badly damaged to be allowed to stay up. MAYBE!

BUT neither of us is an expert in these matters, and its very premature to jump to conspiracy conclusions.