Post by seahawksraawk00 on Sept 4, 2018 20:15:05 GMT
hmm maybe general Ross was right that they do need to be kept in check because seemingly everywhere they go there is death and destruction.
www.digitalspy.com/movies/feature/g25450/marvel-movie-death-count-mcu-films-ranked-infinity-war/?
It's collateral damage and it makes sense too because the Avengers aren't perfect and it's ridiculous that people have a problem with that. And it's something DC hasn't figured out either. Snyder tried to get around that by having fights happen in "conveniently empty" places" but it just doesn't work. But the killing has been challenged by the world with Scarlett Witch. She was inexperienced and didn't think before she acted and while it saved some on the ground it killed others in the building. And that was a plot point of Civil War and the nail in the coffin essentially for the Avengers to be operating freely. So the issue of the damage the Avengers cause is directly challenged.
As for the Avengers themselves killing;
Cap is a soldier. I don't think he would directly kill someone if it could be avoided, but by the same token, he may do it if necessary because again, he's a soldier.
Hawkeye and Black Widow are both assassins.
It was never established Iron Man doesn't kill or has problems with it. He killed terrorists in the first Iron Man.
Thor is a God who doesn't necessarily have to abide by Earth's rules. Not to mention he and Asgard were helping defend earth and the universe.
Hulk is a tricky one but it's almost a plot point all the time that Banner doesn't want to be Hulk in public and some of his rampages are a result of someone else provoking/manipulating/controling him (Scarlett Witch). But when he's in control of the Hulk, while he does cause probably the most collateral damage out of the Avengers, it's never purposely. But like the others, it's never really been established he doesn't kill.