|
|
Post by kuatorises on Oct 9, 2018 14:13:58 GMT
We decide that an intervention is needed when certain animal populations grow out of control, but we continue to expand our own stronghold on land. Why are we any different?
We treat humans differently from bears and other animals because we are humans, and not bears or other animals.I'm sure bears put more importance on bears than they do on humans. That seems a perfectly reasonable attitude.As for overpopulation, I've never really believed that that's a thing.A lack of objectivity seems reasonable to you?
There were reports released just yesterday warning us that if we don't do something about global warming, which can be tied to population and similar issues, that we are quickly approaching the point of becoming irreversible.
|
|