Post by Skaathar on Oct 13, 2018 14:32:42 GMT
Again, there's nothing wrong with that, but it's definitely incorrect to say that she's getting paid similar wages to her male counterparts. All you need to do is look at their IW salaries to know that's incorrect, as both Thor and Cap had way bigger roles in IW than BW.
Also, here's the article I was using for IW salaries:
www.mensxp.com/entertainment/hollywood/44590-here-s-how-much-each-actor-earned-for-lsquo-avengers-infinity-war-rsquo.html
Which lists a smaller salary for both Evans and Hemsworth.
Lead actors are paid primarily on the basis of how many movie-goers they can attract to theaters during the first two weeks of a movie's opening.
By compensating Scarlett at the same level as Hemsworth and Evans (according to HR), what Marvel Studios is saying is, we believe that relative to the film's budget, Johansen can attract as many viewers as Evans or Hemsworth could.
As for your comment about her "attracting" many viewers, that would only make sense if Scarjo is actually marketable. But I don't recall any lead film of hers that grossed as much as movies like CATWS, Thor Ragnarok or Black Panther. No, this probably boils down to her (and her manager/agent) simply being very good negotiators. And you know what? That's great. Good for her to milk that much cash. But to assert that she's simply getting paid no more than her male-costars is a very misleading assumption as no male MCU actor has ever gotten close to a $15 million paycheck for their first solo movie.

