Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2018 7:43:19 GMT
Of course. I'm still not following why answering a question would be perceived as nefarious.
I don't believe you. Not after your last response, which is precisely what I expected after the first one. I knew that was coming. I think you know who I asked and why. I think you know the point I'm trying to make and I know you know it doesn't apply to you, or me. I wasn't sure until your next response.
You asked a question on an open message board and then you're perplexed when someone answers it? Sorry that I upset you. Here's a question for you. What do our avatars have in common? I'm not uptight so anyone can feel free to hazard a guess.
You have a black and white movie for an avatar and gave the briefest possible answer that still qualifies as one before asking me the same question. So what does a guy with a black and white movie photo have to gain from asking another guy with a black and white movie photo when last he saw a black and white movie? My guess is you stepped in to protect a friend. You know my question was tailor made for his comment about colors, and that no one's answer could be valuable to the point as his. I know you know it's why I asked him because it's in your first response to me. It's not answering a question that's nefarious, it's answering the question the way you did (minimalist) and asking it in return (knowing that asking me in return serves no purpose). You didn't even say what movie you saw, you just went right into "You asked a question on an open message board and then you're perplexed when someone answers it? Sorry that I upset you." That looks like the response you had lying in wait, and it combined with the rest, looks like your real hand.
That's why I don't believe your intentions are friendly.