|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Nov 3, 2018 12:43:17 GMT
Saw the tweets on Bored Panda a couple of months ago. The logic is not entirely flawless but the overall message is spot on. For once I agree with you cool Cool!   It is easy to make a joke of it, butt for me it highlights the general lack of responsibility shown my some men and then the hypocrisy of some other men who might prohibit abortion on religious grounds. I absolutely love taking arguments to their end point or 'logical' conclusion, and in this case it might be that men would be prohibited from sexual intercourse unless they and their partner were specifically trying to have a baby. They could apply for an exemption and earn a 'sex licence' ( like a car licence ) if they had undertaken a course in safe sex and passed their exam and had a character reference and no previous sexual offences. A licence to root responsibly. Women who trusted their menfolk could go off the pill and stop screwing with their hormones. An exemption could also be granted for men willing to go on trials for a male contraceptive pill, so that they too could have a turn screwing with their hormones. I like it. Suppose more men became priests?
|
|