|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 7, 2018 20:23:25 GMT
Women who were subservient to a King and had to take orders from a King and weren't allowed to rule. That's not a positive portrayal. Wonder Woman had a woman was the ruler. Black Panther had women who weren't allowed to rule and were subservient to a King and had to take orders from a King. You aren't critical of Monarchy giving orders or you would have a Problem with Queen Hippolyta giving orders. So it must be only when Men give Orders to Women. You must think every female Military person is "subservient" to a man. And you are using Women being Subservient as a bad thing. So you must really hate the US Military. Every Female Military Person is Subservient to a Man the Commander in Chief. I'm not referring to the US military and how it's structured. I'm referring to your claim that Black Panther empowered women and I pvoed that was false by showing that not only does Black Panther have the women being subservient to a King and taking orders from a King, but also Wakanda has a society where women aren't even allowed to challenge for the throne and rule. At least the US allows women to run for POTUS and (if they can win enough electoral votes) become POTUS. But Wakanda doesn't even allow women to challenge for the throne and rule, as proven by the fact that despite all those female warriors that you mentioned in Black Panther, not a single female warrior stepped forward to challenge Killmonger for the throne after Killmonger threw T'Challa over the edge of the waterfall and claimed the throne and everyone thought T'Challa was dead. So either Wakanda doesn't allow women to challenge for the throne and rule or they didn't believe any of the female warriors were skilled enough to defeat Killmonger in combat. Either way, it devalues women. |
|
