Post by jamesbamesy on Nov 11, 2018 12:21:27 GMT
I can kind of see where you’re coming from, but I ultimately disagree particularly in 2 things:
1. Does a parody really call for more gore, and jumpscares? That’s your everyday horror film really. A parody would be more like everyday elements a comedy would have; run-on jokes and decisions the characters made are ridiculously yet intentionally stupid.
2. Laurie was genuine in the film. You could feel the emotion she had. I know that it was a dumb idea for her to stay where she was, whereas in H20 she moved to California to avoid those terrors, but her motive for staying there was reasonable enough.
Also, that pumpkin opening was the bomb!
1. Does a parody really call for more gore, and jumpscares? That’s your everyday horror film really. A parody would be more like everyday elements a comedy would have; run-on jokes and decisions the characters made are ridiculously yet intentionally stupid.
2. Laurie was genuine in the film. You could feel the emotion she had. I know that it was a dumb idea for her to stay where she was, whereas in H20 she moved to California to avoid those terrors, but her motive for staying there was reasonable enough.
Also, that pumpkin opening was the bomb!