|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Nov 14, 2018 18:44:44 GMT
I guess you mean like Ernest Borgnine did in that movie "Violent Saturday." My feeling on it is that if it's acceptable to use lethal force to defend a family member then it's also acceptable to use lethal force to defend someone who is NOT a family member. C'mon, don't bail on me just when it's getting interesting. I'll repeat my question: And if that is the case, then wouldn't it be equally acceptable for a Christian, say in 1995, to travel to Rwanda and take up arms against Hutu soldiers who were engaged in a genocide that murdered almost a million Tutsi villagers?
I'm bailing on you? Your second question is more specific than the first. As long as it was a defensive action on behalf of the Tutsis, I would say yes. If you mean an offensive action against the Hutus, I would say no. Interesting enough for you? |
|
