|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 16, 2018 18:48:50 GMT
That's kinda the point of the film, if you didn't notice. The Accords are to hold the Avengers responsible for their mistakes and to dictate/control when their involvement is needed. Cap's unwillingness to sign is because it takes away their right to choose and limits their ability to help when it's desperately needed. Not so that he can be a "tyrant". Maybe he's wrong and his actions sometimes make things worse, but this is what makes him and all of these characters interesting. This statement makes me insanely angry. Not because you personally said it, because I hate Cap's argument. "Right to choose", lol. Cops can't kick down doors without a warrant. One country can't just march into another and "take out the bad guys" because it's the right thing to do. There are laws prohibiting such things - specifically so that authority doesn't become too powerful. Cops and soldiers can't just pick and choose when and who they want to bust. There's a chain of command. Exactly! That's the point that I've been trying to explain here for 2 years! There has to be a clear chain of command and supervision/oversight. But Cap thinks that since he's stronger than any cop, he has the right to kick down doors without a warrant and Cap doesn't want any supervision/oversight because he wants to be a tyrant who has unlimited power and authority. |
|
