Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 16, 2018 18:56:38 GMT
This statement makes me insanely angry. Not because you personally said it, because I hate Cap's argument. "Right to choose", lol. Cops can't kick down doors without a warrant. One country can't just march into another and "take out the bad guys" because it's the right thing to do. There are laws prohibiting such things - specifically so that authority doesn't become too powerful. Cops and soldiers can't just pick and choose when and who they want to bust. There's a chain of command. Exactly! That's the point that I've been trying to explain here for 2 years! There has to be a clear chain of command and supervision/oversight. But Cap thinks that since he's stronger than any cop, he has the right to kick down doors without a warrant and Cap doesn't want any supervision/oversight because he wants to be a tyrant who has unlimited power and authority. That's ignoring any reason he has to distrust that supervision/oversight. There's more to the story, and it was presented in the narrative. |
|
