|
|
Post by kuatorises on Nov 17, 2018 1:31:43 GMT
This statement makes me insanely angry. Not because you personally said it, because I hate Cap's argument. "Right to choose", lol. Cops can't kick down doors without a warrant. One country can't just march into another and "take out the bad guys" because it's the right thing to do. There are laws prohibiting such things - specifically so that authority doesn't become too powerful. Cops and soldiers can't just pick and choose when and who they want to bust. There's a chain of command. Exactly! That's the point that I've been trying to explain here for 2 years! There has to be a clear chain of command and supervision/oversight. But Cap thinks that since he's stronger than any cop, he has the right to kick down doors without a warrant and Cap doesn't want any supervision/oversight because he wants to be a tyrant who has unlimited power and authority. We've talked about this before in other similar threads. Cap is...kind of an asshole. He just has no regard for anything. Christ, Wanda (who is not my favorite) even shows remorse for what happened in Civil War. Cap is all, "Oh, well there's collateral damage sometimes and BUCKY!!!" Cap is wrong, but hating authority is cool and authority is always wrong, so most people side with him.
Where we disagree is you think the movie fails. You're wrong. The movie does a very good job of portraying the two sides. Just because you and I don't like Cap's POV doesn't mean the movie is a failure. There has to be conflict. There has to be someone to disagree with. I disagree with him to the point that I've actually grown to kinda dislike him, but that dosen't mean that character's portrayal or the movie's storyline isn't good.
|
|