|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 18, 2018 1:41:53 GMT
If the comments about Stan Lee continue then there will be problems but if these comments are from before this was pointed out and especially elsewhere then that was another time. If you see more like it from now then it needs to be pointed out. All of King Kong's examples are from before these new rules so those are irrelevant. But I do have another question: In 1 of my previous posts, I mentioned a comic that was created by Stan Lee and King Kong threw a hissy fit and wanted me banned for mentioning that. Are we not allow to mention a comic, book, TV show, movie etc. that's authored, created, directed, produced, etc. by someone when discussing that person, regardless of how awful that comic, book, TV show, movie, etc. was? I get that some works of art may be so awful that some people want to pretend it didn't happen. But that would be like an American History teacher teaching about the Founding Fathers and the Constitution but pretending that the Founding Fathers didn't allow slavery in the Constitution. Slavery was an awful thing, but we can't pretend that it didn't happen. And we can't pretend that a writer, director, producer, etc. didn't create, direct, produce, etc. a specific work that's credited to them even if that work was awful.
|
|