|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Nov 26, 2018 22:47:00 GMT
vits, I am really not sure if your art of film criticism is worth honoring. For someone who appears to be a film aficionado, you sure do have some strange opinions. Whatever the reason is, is yours to behold, but you can't expect other to find what you write meaningful, especially when your ratings don't appear to rate up. 1) The art isn't mine. It's not anyone's. I was talking about how you don't think there's a difference between a 4 and a 5. There's a reason why a numeral system has been used for decades. My taste might not be the same as you and some other users, but at least I respect the legacy left behind by critics. 2) The funny thing about statements like that is that there are no middle grounds, only absolutes. That means that the (many) positive ratings I've given to classics and the (many) negative ratings I've given to anti-classics also aren't "valid." 3) You can't expect me to find what you write meaningful when you don't even bother to ask me the reason behind the number. Deflection vits. The art of CRITICISM. This was your own point.
I hardly think that your film criticism is going to leave an impactful legacy and any criticism is really only valid to the criticizer themselves. Some my agree with you, others won't. If they don't, and you feel the need to justify your stance, then this will most likely happen. 
Regardless whatever your reason is, it is only valid to you and up for contention, debate and dispute. That is the art of discussion.
|
|