|
|
Post by Ecstasy on Dec 7, 2018 13:50:03 GMT
1) The ''smart'' thing to tie Venom into the MCU wasn't actually smart, because they made bank without it. This just comes off as arrogant. ''Other studios need MCU help, without it they would fail''. So regarding Venom he was wrong. 2) Venom had no relation to the MCU, and is currently at $845M. Homecoming, with heavy involvement from MCU poster boy Tony Stark, finished at $880M. So his statement of ''The solo Venom flick for instance, would automatically sell more tickets and DVD's if it has at least some relation to the MCU, even if that is vague and undefined, than if it had no connection whatsoever.'' is false. Venom had no relation to the MCU and still got on par with an MCU spiderman film. That still doesn’t make his statement false. No matter how much money it made, he’s implying it would have made even more money due to the MCU popularity swell in pop culture at the moment that is undeniable. Unless, of course, your point is the MCU movies are routinely breaking box office records due solely to their film quality? Interesting point you make, maybe you’re right. People generally believe that Venom is film by Marvel because of the logo. Kevin Feige even said that most people don’t know about the studio stuff.
|
|