Why science and atheists fall short in explaining consciousness.

Why science and atheists fall short in explaining consciousness. Dec 9, 2018 14:49:28 GMT

Quote

Post by heeeeey on Dec 9, 2018 14:49:28 GMT

Dec 9, 2018 11:09:46 GMT Hairynosedwombat said:

Dec 3, 2018 19:04:51 GMT heeeeey said:

And what your ignorant, pompous ass can't grasp is that as of now, nobody can 'prove' something that is beyond comprehension. Your stupid ass can't even comprehend the concept of eternity/infinity (where does light come from, derp?) let alone singularity of all that exists or God.

Odds are more in favor of my being correct than your limited, dumb ass.

You keep making unsupportable assertions and pretend they have substance.

consciousness as a real phenomenon that can be described objectively and mathematically.
your problem seems to be that your incomplete reading of IIT somehow bears some relationship to proving there is a god. Nope!

nobody can 'prove' something that is beyond comprehension.
A tautology isn't any deep and meaningful statement. It is as meaningful as "there's the sun".

Yes, I maintain that if there were odds, they would be in my favor. To not believe there is anything beyond the limitations of the five senses is one thing, but to proclaim as an indisputable fact that awareness is a product of the brain is nothing but arrogant pomposity. As is arrogantly proclaiming that something can come out of nothing.