Post by Vassaggo on Dec 28, 2018 18:18:10 GMT
.
My general opinion on Oscars are they aren't about merit. They haven't been in years or if ever. It is a circle jerk for an industry. There are always other factors in play. I can link you to multiple times I've said this. It's about business, emotions, campaigning, and capturing the Zeitgeist of the moment.
Opinion 1: One of the factors that got Heath Ledger a nomination and win was his untimely death. It was framed in such a way to highlight his great performance. I believe, as in my opinion, that his performance is the closest that any comicbook/superhero movie has come to getting an oscar in the major awards and deserving it. The Media framed his performance as a tortured artist who literally died for his art.
Opinion 2 One of the factors that got Logan a nomination was that Hugh Jackman said it was his last movie and that his character died. Hugh Jackman helped bring forth this Golden Age of Comic Books. He was a beloved Character and Actor who in 15+ years in 8 movies helped define an ERA of Cinema. I am of the opinion that if Hugh Jackman had 2 or 3 more movies on his contract and Logan didn't die then the movie and screenplay wouldn't have the punch it does.
Opinion 3 One of the factors that got Black Panther it's award nominations now is that it's a movie that was Written, Directed and Starred mostly by Africans and AFrican Americans. It's the first large budgeted movie that has proven that that combination can work at the box office. That people will flock to it. It matched the US Cultural zeitgeist and is reaping the rewards.
These statements in no way equate the quality of the 3 movies. It just points out 3 factors of which there are many, that have nothing to do with the quality of the movies that help push the 3 to award fame. I don't call the artificial boosters because all movies have boosters. No movie is seen in a vacuum during award season. All Studios frame movies with a narrative.
I used Rotten Tomatoes % and Rating, IMDB Rating, and Award nominations as evidence of what movies were Critically and Audience Acclaimed. Barring me going and researching every Critic's review of a movie and every viewer of a movie how else am I supposed to define if a movie is Acclaimed or not. I could use Metacritic also but a lot of the Critics on Metacritic are the same ones on Rotten Tomatoes.
And if you look at my statements I wasn't even using Rotten Tomatoes, IMDB and Award Nominations as evidence against Logan or TDK. I was rebutting your opinion that Winter Soldier was more Prestigious and Acclaimed than any other MCU Movie. The fucked up thing it's my opinion that Winter Soldier IS a better MOVIE than Black Panther, but the FACT remains if we are going to use words like Prestigious and Acclaimed then Winter Solider isn't the most Acclaimed or Prestigious.
Prestigious:
adjective
inspiring respect and admiration; having high status.
How do we quantify respect, admiration, or status for a movie? The only way I know how is to find out how the general public thought about the movie and how critics thought about the movie. I used Rotten Tomatoes to show critics rating and yes or no percentage. I used Rotten Tomatoes audience score, and IMDB public rating to show how the public felt about it. You can have a opinion that the Critics are biased to MCU movies, but critical review is part of the equation in finding respect, admiration and status. That's why the term CRITICALLY ACCLAIMED IS USED. In the scenario the "MCU Critic Bias" if it exists doesn't apply as I am comparing all MCU movies. The Bias would show itself in all the critics reviews for each movie.
Acclaim:
verb
praise enthusiastically and publicly. To Honor.
Praise is the act of showing respect.
A synonym for Praise and Honor is to AWARD.
This goes along with Critical and Audience Acclaim, but it's also slightly different. So I used the Award nom. count even though awards are mainly bullshit to show that other MCU movies garnered more awards nom than Winter Soldier.
So lets Use Metacritic instead of Rotten Tomatoes. (Unless you are saying that even though I am comparing Critics views on all MCU movies that Critics have no part in praising a movie???)
Winter Soldier Metacritic 70 out of 100.
Winter Soldier Metacritic Audience Score 8.5 out of 10.
Guardians of the Galaxy Metacritic 76 out of 100.
Guardians of the Galaxy Metacritic Audience Score 8.5 out of 10.
Iron-man Metacritic 79 out of 100
Iron-man Metacritic Audience Score 8.5 out of 10
Well what do you know Guardians of the Galaxy, Ironman is more Critically Acclaimed than Winter Soldier there too. When it comes to Audience Acclaim they are tied.
How is that working out when you consider most here have said Aquaman is better than half the mcu movies and has a lower rt score than all mcu films?
see how you loose credibility? Shame you became an mcu fanatic, defending the bullishtness of MCU.
Hell I agree that Aquaman, to me, is about right in the center of MCU. I never said that Critical Acclaim and rating was proof that a movie was good. Critics state their Opinion. If more Critics (and audience) Opinion is positive for a movie then by definition that movie is more prestigious and acclaimed. I used Critical Acclaim and Rating as proof of movies having more Acclaim than another. Acclaim doesn't make a movie better. It's not an opinion that Critics and General Population put more acclaim, honor, prestige, etc on MCU movies other than Winter Soldier. How they rate a movie is an opinion, reciting what they rated is a Fact. This means that Winter Solider isn't the most prestige, honored, awarded, rated, critically acclaimed MCU movie.
Let me go simpler. Critic 1 rating = opinion, Critic 2 rating = opinion... Critic 100 rating = opinion. Now if we took all those ratings and averaged them the average rating is the average opinion of the 100 critics. Stating that 100 critic's rating averaged to 7.5 is a fact. That doesn't give credence to their individual or collective opinion it's just stating a fact. See the difference?
FACTS.
1. Its has been confirmed they will use time travel for Avengers. The movie will be terrible not because of time travel but it will be terrible because it will be another cgi mess with no substance.
1. Its has been confirmed they will use time travel for Avengers. The movie will be terrible not because of time travel but it will be terrible because it will be another cgi mess with no substance.
Marvel Studios Executive saying they will be using time travel.
or
The Russo's saying they will be using time travel.
or
A video of raw footage that shows time travel will be used from End Game.
Wait. Nevermind on the first two because it was CONFIRMED that the name of the MOVIE had never been said in a MCU movie by Russo's when people guessed End Game. And what do you know the name of the Movie is End Game. That phrase was said in at least 2 MCU movies AoU and IW. So unless you have a video showing definite use of time travel. Then no it hasn't been Confirmed.
2. DOFP did not have a happy ending. The ending was questionable. Since in the end, the LAST line was the future was never truly set. And as we see in logan. Mutants still met their tragic end.
no happy ending there. logam xavier, xmen. all gone.
So typical of mcu fans Lie about another movie to make mcu look less bad.
4. JLAw phoned it in Apocalypse not DOFP. Infact DOFP was the film that showed how complex she is. There is no female character in comics that has been as complex as mystique was in DOFP outside of catwoman in TDKR and Batman Returns. As seen in 2014 you cant equate mystique's arc in DOFP to black widow in winter solider that had none. Lawrence is a great actress and it showed in DOFP she was praised for. Reason she was trashed in Apocalypse for not giving the phoned performance. These are critical facts.
truthful opinions
5. You are free to think first class is the superior movie however both movies (first class and dofp) are superior to infinity war and helped the genre to infinity war that harmed with it.
6. Mcfly was in real danger. It was more horrifying to see him fade or worse his mum falling in love with him, creepy as hell and scary too.
leave it to mcu fans to say it was not because they cant say the same for infinity war.
leave it to mcu fans to say it was not because they cant say the same for infinity war.
7.
infinity war deaths was shock value as said, its like writing on a cw show. maybe if the death had some juxtaposition story telling like DOFP. it would have been better.
infinity war deaths was shock value as said, its like writing on a cw show. maybe if the death had some juxtaposition story telling like DOFP. it would have been better.
Like the Dusted Deaths I never thought the Future Deaths would stick. I thought the simple dignity that Charles and Eric had at the end when they were about to temporarily die really tugged at the heart strings. The rest of the deaths I wasn't that emotionally invested. There was no moment for that to happen. Except when Kitty looked for Bobby and looked crest fallen. I can't remember if that was in the Theatrical Cut or just the Rogue Cut though.
Deaths in general don't mean much when you know it's going to be reversed. What does mean a lot is moments between characters before they are reversed. I just thought there were more and better moments at the end of IW.
LOL..Look at mcu fans attacking DOFP and back to the future. really? this movies are compelling sci fi drama. they get respect for that alone. Infinity war cant since it is just cgi garbage. time travel or no time travel.
next time listen to James Cameron, could help you be more honest.
I think I will listen to James Cameron especially when he says he loves the movies. I will also agree that there needs to be diverse Sci-Fi and Sci-Fantasy out there. I think there is enough room out there for more now with 700+ movies made per year.


