Post by Vassaggo on Dec 28, 2018 21:37:23 GMT

My general opinion on Oscars are they aren't about merit. They haven't been in years or if ever. It is a circle jerk for an industry. There are always other factors in play. I can link you to multiple times I've said this. It's about business, emotions, campaigning, and capturing the Zeitgeist of the moment.
Opinion 1: One of the factors that got Heath Ledger a nomination and win was his untimely death. It was framed in such a way to highlight his great performance. I believe, as in my opinion, that his performance is the closest that any comicbook/superhero movie has come to getting an oscar in the major awards and deserving it. The Media framed his performance as a tortured artist who literally died for his art.
Opinion 2 One of the factors that got Logan a nomination was that Hugh Jackman said it was his last movie and that his character died. Hugh Jackman helped bring forth this Golden Age of Comic Books. He was a beloved Character and Actor who in 15+ years in 8 movies helped define an ERA of Cinema. I am of the opinion that if Hugh Jackman had 2 or 3 more movies on his contract and Logan didn't die then the movie and screenplay wouldn't have the punch it does.
Opinion 3 One of the factors that got Black Panther it's award nominations now is that it's a movie that was Written, Directed and Starred mostly by Africans and AFrican Americans. It's the first large budgeted movie that has proven that that combination can work at the box office. That people will flock to it. It matched the US Cultural zeitgeist and is reaping the rewards.
These statements in no way equate the quality of the 3 movies. It just points out 3 factors of which there are many, that have nothing to do with the quality of the movies that help push the 3 to award fame. I don't call the artificial boosters because all movies have boosters. No movie is seen in a vacuum during award season. All Studios frame movies with a narrative.
I used Rotten Tomatoes % and Rating, IMDB Rating, and Award nominations as evidence of what movies were Critically and Audience Acclaimed. Barring me going and researching every Critic's review of a movie and every viewer of a movie how else am I supposed to define if a movie is Acclaimed or not. I could use Metacritic also but a lot of the Critics on Metacritic are the same ones on Rotten Tomatoes.
And if you look at my statements I wasn't even using Rotten Tomatoes, IMDB and Award Nominations as evidence against Logan or TDK. I was rebutting your opinion that Winter Soldier was more Prestigious and Acclaimed than any other MCU Movie. The fucked up thing it's my opinion that Winter Soldier IS a better MOVIE than Black Panther, but the FACT remains if we are going to use words like Prestigious and Acclaimed then Winter Solider isn't the most Acclaimed or Prestigious.
Prestigious:
adjective
inspiring respect and admiration; having high status.
How do we quantify respect, admiration, or status for a movie? The only way I know how is to find out how the general public thought about the movie and how critics thought about the movie. I used Rotten Tomatoes to show critics rating and yes or no percentage. I used Rotten Tomatoes audience score, and IMDB public rating to show how the public felt about it. You can have a opinion that the Critics are biased to MCU movies, but critical review is part of the equation in finding respect, admiration and status. That's why the term CRITICALLY ACCLAIMED IS USED. In the scenario the "MCU Critic Bias" if it exists doesn't apply as I am comparing all MCU movies. The Bias would show itself in all the critics reviews for each movie.
Acclaim:
verb
praise enthusiastically and publicly. To Honor.
Praise is the act of showing respect.
A synonym for Praise and Honor is to AWARD.
This goes along with Critical and Audience Acclaim, but it's also slightly different. So I used the Award nom. count even though awards are mainly bullshit to show that other MCU movies garnered more awards nom than Winter Soldier.
So lets Use Metacritic instead of Rotten Tomatoes. (Unless you are saying that even though I am comparing Critics views on all MCU movies that Critics have no part in praising a movie???)
Winter Soldier Metacritic 70 out of 100.
Winter Soldier Metacritic Audience Score 8.5 out of 10.
Guardians of the Galaxy Metacritic 76 out of 100.
Guardians of the Galaxy Metacritic Audience Score 8.5 out of 10.
Iron-man Metacritic 79 out of 100
Iron-man Metacritic Audience Score 8.5 out of 10
Well what do you know Guardians of the Galaxy, Ironman is more Critically Acclaimed than Winter Soldier there too. When it comes to Audience Acclaim they are tied.
Hell I agree that Aquaman, to me, is about right in the center of MCU. I never said that Critical Acclaim and rating was proof that a movie was good. Critics state their Opinion. If more Critics (and audience) Opinion is positive for a movie then by definition that movie is more prestigious and acclaimed. I used Critical Acclaim and Rating as proof of movies having more Acclaim than another. Acclaim doesn't make a movie better. It's not an opinion that Critics and General Population put more acclaim, honor, prestige, etc on MCU movies other than Winter Soldier. How they rate a movie is an opinion, reciting what they rated is a Fact. This means that Winter Solider isn't the most prestige, honored, awarded, rated, critically acclaimed MCU movie.
Let me go simpler. Critic 1 rating = opinion, Critic 2 rating = opinion... Critic 100 rating = opinion. Now if we took all those ratings and averaged them the average rating is the average opinion of the 100 critics. Stating that 100 critic's rating averaged to 7.5 is a fact. That doesn't give credence to their individual or collective opinion it's just stating a fact. See the difference?
Ok I will believe you that Time Travel has been confirmed just point me to a link where:
Marvel Studios Executive saying they will be using time travel.
or
The Russo's saying they will be using time travel.
or
A video of raw footage that shows time travel will be used from End Game.
Wait. Nevermind on the first two because it was CONFIRMED that the name of the MOVIE had never been said in a MCU movie by Russo's when people guessed End Game. And what do you know the name of the Movie is End Game. That phrase was said in at least 2 MCU movies AoU and IW. So unless you have a video showing definite use of time travel. Then no it hasn't been Confirmed.
Listen to yourself. A sequel of a movie had a sad ending so therefore all the movies before it's endings are sad in retrospect. So do you hold off judging the sadness or happiness of an ending until a Studio stops making the series of Movies? A New Hope's ending was sad because Empire Strike Backs ending was sad? Well until Return of the Jedi's ending happened then Empire's ending magically became Happy and Hope's ending reverted back to happy.
It was my opinion that Jennifer Phoned it in. I never said it was a fact. I said it felt like she phoned it in. Now Critics may have praised her in the role. I don't ever remember her being singled out in that movie. It may be true. I remember McAvoy, Jackman and Fastbender being praised, but not her. If that's the case then bully for them. In my opinion she felt disconnected, drab, and phoning it in.
And you can feel free to think that FC and DoFP are Superior to Infinity War. That's your opinion it's no greater or lesser than my Opinion. I think First Class is Superior to Infinity War and Infinity War is Superior to DoFP. Your opinion is just as valid as my opinion when it comes to what Infinity War did for Comic Book Movies. We think the opposite. (I can point to the sustained high praise
To you it was real danger. To me it wasn't. There was never a part of me that thought that Marty McFly the main character of a Family Comedy Movie in the 80's was ever going to die.
This is your strongest opinion to me. I don't agree with it, but I can relate to your opinion. There was planned shock in the deaths there is no denying that. The Juxtaposition that took place of the devastation of the Sentinels and the Hate they represent vs the Mutants choosing Mercy to the people who would eventually destroy them helps to frame the future deaths. I don't think it gives the future deaths more meaning or the belief the deaths would stick, but there was a great comparison to each other.
Like the Dusted Deaths I never thought the Future Deaths would stick. I thought the simple dignity that Charles and Eric had at the end when they were about to temporarily die really tugged at the heart strings. The rest of the deaths I wasn't that emotionally invested. There was no moment for that to happen. Except when Kitty looked for Bobby and looked crest fallen. I can't remember if that was in the Theatrical Cut or just the Rogue Cut though.
Deaths in general don't mean much when you know it's going to be reversed. What does mean a lot is moments between characters before they are reversed. I just thought there were more and better moments at the end of IW.
Those aren't attacks. Most are just my opinions or me using objective facts to support my opinions. The funny thing you call me doing this as attacks. I want to believe all of us here are just really passionate about what we like and dislike. I try to look at your post through that prism, but sometimes you make that hard.
I think I will listen to James Cameron especially when he says he loves the movies. I will also agree that there needs to be diverse Sci-Fi and Sci-Fantasy out there. I think there is enough room out there for more now with 700+ movies made per year.
The media framed ledger? At least ledger deserved it. Black panther doesn’t..
I agree if we had to compare Ledger's to all of BP he would deserve it over BP. I never said it did over him. I just said that his nomination and win wasn't 100% merit. NO movies nomination or win is based strictly on merit.
It's just my personal opinion, which has nothing to do with the other opinion that more than merit is considered, that no superhero/comicbook movie has deserved a main Oscar. Those 2 things aren't mutually exclusive. I don't think he deserved a Nomination. I also don't think that most of the academy thought he didn't and only voted on it because he died.
I'm saying that I didn't think it deserved. I'm pretty sure a lot of academy members thought he did, but his death being framed/given scope highlighted the performance. Making even more people think he deserved it. I just don't agree. He was close but no cigar.
I never meant to imply that that was the sole factor and the Academy was giving him a pity fuck because he died. I was just saying that that was just one factor out of many.
Long story short. Film quality. Logan and tdk are superior to black panther.
Cool that you think GOTG and iron man are more acclaimed as winter solider. As long you also agree iron man 3 is more acclaimed than forrest gump and gladiator. I much rather agree with martin Scorsese on how to judge acclaimed movies not a mcu fan
that knows nothing.
that knows nothing.
What is your definition of Acclaimed and that of Prestigious? I gave you Websters . By the definition of the 2 words yes GotG and Iron-man is more prestigious and acclaimed. Without changing the dictionary definition of the word tell me how Winter Solider is more Acclaimed and Prestigious than GoTG and Iron-Man. Was Winter Soldier higher rated by audiences? Was Winter Soldier given more Acclaim and Respect by Critics? Did Winter Soldier earn more nomination/wins for awards?
Time travel for avenger’ engcrap? Sure. Make sense. I am not against time travel but I am against bad time travel movie as endgame will be.
www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/1056155/Avengers-4-trailer-Avengers-Endgame-trailer-time-travel-Ant-Man-Quantum-Realm
www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/1056155/Avengers-4-trailer-Avengers-Endgame-trailer-time-travel-Ant-Man-Quantum-Realm
So your definition of CONFIRMED is an article that is speculating with the limited data we have? They have a question mark in the title and the first sentence says "AVENGERS 4 Endgame’s trailer seems to tease time travel to reverse Thanos’ Snap in Avengers Infinity War."
Again the only people who can confirm that time travel is in the movie are: The Writers, Actors, Execs, and people who have seen the movie. And even if they confirm it doesn't mean it's true. The Russo's said that End Game wasn't the title. The actors shot multiple scripts/scenes, The Russo's also put misinformation in the IW trailer. Hulk fighting in Wakanda and Thanos fighting Captain America with only 2 stones. How can we trust anything about what the movie will be and what will be confirmed if you can't trust the Trailers or The Russos?
also, respect the classic like back to the future. Dont hate it because it will be superior to infinity war endcrap.
hm. Logan was the ending to the main universe . was the ending happy? That is no. so you lied when you said DOFP had an happy ending that was not true because the ending said the future is not set. You cant argue with the facts of what happened in the film
the overall ending to star wars was happy and optimistic Period,
the overall ending to star wars was happy and optimistic Period,
Dude you have to be kidding. How is the ending to series of movies the ending to all the movies? So if I've never seen Logan or Days of Future Past and was just fixing to watch them, but was nervous if I would like DoFP ending being sad. If I asked you go ahead and spoil the ending to DoFP for me and Just DoFP. If you agreed would you say "Logan dies at the end and his clone daughter recites Shane at his grave?" or would you say "Logan saves the day, changes the past which erases much of X3."
Words have meanings. The end of DoFP is the end of DoFP. The end of Logan is the end of Logan. And we don't know if New Mutants takes place in the main universe or if it's before or after the events of Logan. If it's not then the end of the Series is sad, but not the end of the previous movies because of the last one.
its your opinon jlaw phoned it in . That is the opinions of mcu fans who are desperate to attack DOFP because it killed mcu movies in 2014 and expose mcu for the kiddie garbage fraud toy commericalthey are. Thankfully honest film criticism can speak for itself. In the end mcu fans cant name one mcu female as complex and 3 dimensional as mystique. Let that fact sink in.
Dude that tact won't work for me. Barring X3, Origins, and Apocalypse I love or like the other X-men Movies. I'm not some blind MCU Fan that thinks every MCU movie is better than any comicbook movie.
Again learn Opinion vs Fact. Anybody I name as Complex and 3d as Mystique would just be my opinion. Just like it's your Opinion that Mystique is Complex and 3D. It would be Opinion vs Opinion.
The layers of Mystique in the First Class generation of Xmen films. Abandon child who hates she's a mutant who comes to grips with her difference. Broken by losses she goes down a path of evil, but is saved by mercy. Consigned to fight for those who are different to the detriment to her soul finally comes to grip with what it means to be Mutant and Proud. A lesson that she thought she understood what it meant after her epiphany in FC. She finally understands the true nature of being proud of ones self viscerally. After taking that lesson truely to heart instead of fighting for people who are different she teaches others how to fight and be proud. Did I get that about right? The complexity and 3 dimension-ness isn't even because of Jennifer's performance. It would be the Writing. Writing creates character complexity and dimension. The actress has to just portray that naturally. You could have the worst actor in the world give a performance of the most complex character in the world and the character would still be complex. You could have the best actor in the world portray the least complex character ever written and unless he changes the dialogue, setting, action, etc he couldn't make the character more complex.
Another reason we know about her complexity is we have seen an Arc of hers going from teenager to adult woman. This doesn't paint the MCU in a good light you are right.
All that said even with her bad performance in DofP and Apocalypse her writing has given her a big arc and their isn't one to match in the MCU.
oh and she was praised as well because she is part of the entire cast. many critics single her out for playing such a complex character. She was the most complex character in the film since she was not as evil as eric or as good as Charles. She was the middle man.
BTW I think Jennifer Lawrence is a great actor. Like me and charzhino were talking about a bit ago I think the grueling nature of the makeup started the decent. In the beginning her being young and willing to put up with it helped her performance in FC. After she blew up she got more disenchanted with he movies and the character. I forgot when he said the downward spiral started, but I think we agreed it started in DoFP I don't want to put words in his mouth tho.
LMAOO. WOW. There you have it, mcu fans in full force.they think infinity is Superior to dofp. Please get me james Cameron to school you folks. or Let me dumb it down.
DOFP= heavy story telling socially themed character drama with some sophisticated special effects
Infinity war = cartoonish action driven cgi film for mostly 98% with no actual plot.
DOFP= heavy story telling socially themed character drama with some sophisticated special effects
Infinity war = cartoonish action driven cgi film for mostly 98% with no actual plot.
James Cameron who loved avengers? and was quoted as such?
In the end it's just your opinion that DOFP is Better. You can't prove a subjective stance as objective. You aren't the de facto judge of movies who opinions are facts.
Sure infnity war is better. Please dont ever put dofp and IW in the same sentence again. You cant compare DOFP a movie that was called the best comic drama since tdk to IW one of the worst movies of the year hated by many film makers and long time comic fans for lack of substance.
The genre cant take that sickness.
The genre cant take that sickness.
Who called it the best since was it a critic? Do those count only when you agree with them? Was it just someone else in the business? I would like to talk to de facto Judge of Movies out there who's opinions are facts if it's not you.
who called one of the worst movies of the year? Was it a critic that you agreed with? Do only those critics count? Seems you had a problem with me using the respect they gave to GotG and Iron-man when you didn't agree. Does Acclaim only count when critic agrees with you?
Woah you have quotes from filmmakers that hated IW. Can you post the lot here I'd like to see them. So are they the de facto judge that their opinions get spun into golden facts?
So audience don't count when they acclaim and praise movies you don't like, but when they agree with you they count?
So we can all get it straight tell us the rules succinctly.
When do critics, filmmakers, audience scores count and when they don't.

